Commentary for Bava Kamma 40:17
ויתיב רבי אבהו קמיה דר' יוחנן וקאמר משמיה דשמואל זאת אומרת הדר בחצר חבירו שלא מדעתו צריך להעלות לו שכר ושתק ליה
It was stated: R. Kahana quoting R. Johanan said: [In the case of the above problem] there would be no legal obligation to pay rent; but R. Abbahu similarly quoting R. Johanan said: There would be a legal obligation to pay rent. R. Papa thereupon said: The view expressed by R. Abbahu [on behalf of R. Johanan] was not stated explicitly [by R. Johanan] but was only arrived at by inference. For we learnt: He who misappropriates a stone or a beam belonging to the Temple Treasury<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But which has been all the time in his possession as he had been the authorized Treasurer of the Sanctuary; v. Hag. 11a and Mei. 20a ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 40:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.